4.7 Article

Estimation of trend and random components of conditional random field using Gaussian process regression

Journal

COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104179

Keywords

Spatial variability; Random field; Trend

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a method for simultaneously estimating the trend and random components of soil properties using Gaussian process regression with multiple Gaussian random fields. The Gaussian covariance function is found to be most suitable for trend estimation, and the proposed method can estimate trend and random components at arbitrary locations. The Whittle-Mate 'rn covariance function is determined to be more suitable than the Markovian covariance function for estimating random components in cone penetration test data.
A method is proposed for simultaneously estimating the trend and random component of soil properties at arbitrary locations using Gaussian process regression with the superposition of multiple Gaussian random fields. The proposed method is applied to the estimation of the one-dimensional spatial distributions of the trend component of three synthetic datasets. A comparison of three covariance functions, namely Gaussian, Markovian, and binary noise, indicates that Gaussian covariance is most suitable for trend estimation. The scale of fluctuation and the standard deviation of the random component of the examples are estimated using the maximum likelihood estimation method. The proposed method is also applied to the estimation of the three-dimensional spatial distribution of the trend and random components based on measured cone penetration test data. It is shown that the trend and random components at arbitrary locations can be estimated. The Whittle-Mate ' rn covariance function is found to be more suitable than the Markovian covariance function for the estimation of the random component of the cone penetration test data based on the Akaike information criterion and the Bayesian information criterion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available