4.5 Article

Correlations for aerodynamic coefficients for prolate spheroids in the free molecular regime

Journal

COMPUTERS & FLUIDS
Volume 223, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.104934

Keywords

Aerodynamic correlations; Prolate spheroids; Free molecular regime; Collisionless DSMC approach; Regression analysis

Funding

  1. Science and Engineering research Board (SERB) [MTR/2019/0 0 0041]
  2. Indian Space Research organization [STC/AE/2018033]
  3. Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) [SPARC/20182019/P1103/SL]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aerodynamic correlations for an ellipsoidal particle in the free molecular regime were proposed using DSMC method. The correlations were validated through simulations and regression analysis, showing consistency with experimental data and theory for flow over different parameters.
A new set of aerodynamic correlations are proposed for an ellipsoidal particle in the free molecular regime by carrying out flow simulations using the Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) method. The in-house DSMC solver is modified to be consistent with free molecular flow assumptions as well as to reduce computational cost. The solver is validated against an open-source DSMC solver, viz., SPARTA, the free molecular theory and experimental data for flow over a sphere and right circular cylinder in the free molecular regime. The flow is simulated over ellipsoidal particles at different aspect ratios, angles of attack and speed ratios to estimate the aerodynamic properties. Regression analysis is performed to give correlations for the variation of aerodynamic properties such as drag, lift and torque coefficients. The correlations are rigorously tested against the DSMC results, obtained from our in-house solver as well as those obtained from SPARTA, over a wide range of parameters. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available