4.5 Article

Tai Chi for health and well-being: A bibliometric analysis of published clinical studies between 2010 and 2020

Journal

COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2021.102748

Keywords

Tai Chi; Physical therapy; Exercise; Mind-body therapies; Complementary therapies

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [K24 AT009282]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The volume of clinical studies evaluating Tai Chi published between 2010 and 2020 has significantly increased, with randomized controlled trials being the most common study type. These studies were mainly conducted in China and focused on adult and older adult populations.
The objective of this bibliometric review was to identify the volume, breadth, and characteristics of clinical studies evaluating Tai Chi published between January 2010 and January 2020. Five English and four Chinese language databases were searched. Following independent screening, 1018 eligible publications representing 987 studies were identified, which was a three-fold increase from the previous decade. Most common were randomized controlled trials (548/987, 55.5 %), followed by systematic reviews (157/987, 15.9 %), nonrandomized controlled clinical studies (152/987, 15.4 %), case series (127/987, 12.9 %) and case reports (3/ 987, 0.3 %) that were conducted in China (730/987, 74.0 %), followed by the United States of America (123/ 987, 12.5 %) and South Korea (20/987, 2.0 %). Study participants were mostly in the adult (55.2 %) and/or older adult (72.0 %) age groups. The top ten diseases/conditions were hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, knee osteoarthritis, heart failure, depression, osteoporosis/osteopenia, breast cancer, coronary heart disease and insomnia. A quarter of the studies enrolled healthy participants to evaluate the effects of Tai Chi on health promotion/preservation, balance/falls, and physiological/biomechanical outcomes. Yang style Tai Chi was the most popular, followed by Chen and Sun style. Tai Chi was mostly commonly delivered faceto-face by a Tai Chi instructor in group settings for 60 min, three times a week, for 12 weeks. Most studies (93.8 %) reported at least one outcome in favor of Tai Chi. Adverse events were underreported (7.2 %). Over half fell short of expected intervention reporting standards, signalling the need for Tai Chi extensions to existing guidelines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available