4.7 Article

Rational design of gradient structured fluorocarbon/Al composites towards tunable combustion performance

Journal

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
Volume 230, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111436

Keywords

PTFE/AL composite; Gradient structure; Energy output; Deflagration; Pressure growth

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11872341, 22075261]
  2. CAEP [CX2019013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The gradient structured PTFE/Al composite material, designed and constructed using 3D printing technology, allows for precise control of combustion reaction and energy output performance. By varying the diameter and mass gradient, the material exhibits improved reaction heat and burning rate.
Polytetrafluoroethylene/Aluminum (PTFE/Al) composite with high energy density and combustion reaction performance has received widespread attention in the field of propellants, explosives, and pyrotechnics. In order to precisely control combustion reaction and energy output performance, gradient structured PTFE/Al composite (mass and diameter gradient) has been designed and constructed through 3D printing technology. PTFE/Al ink is prepared by acoustic resonance mixing to control rheological properties (viscosity and modulus) for 3D printing technology. The largest reaction heat (7749.95 J/g) and burning rate (similar to 130 mm/s) are achieved for gradient lines with diameter of 2.42 mm and mass ratio of 60:40 (PTFE/Al). Moreover, the progressive change from steady combustion to deflagration containing three stages of pressure output is observed for gradient structured PTFE/Al cylinder. This work reveals that gradient structure could provide new strategy to tune energy output and combustion performances, which can promote the practical application of PTFE/Al reactive materials. (C) 2021 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available