4.5 Article

Defunctioning stomas may reduce chances of a stoma-free outcome after anterior resection for rectal cancer

Journal

COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages 2859-2869

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/codi.15836

Keywords

defunctioning stoma; mesorectal excision; permanent stoma

Funding

  1. Cancer Research Foundation in Northern Sweden, Agreement Concerning Research and Education of Doctors [ALFVLL-463921]
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  3. Foundation for Medical Research in Skelleftea, Sweden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In anterior resection for rectal cancer, defunctioning stomas may decrease the likelihood of a stoma-free outcome. While the benefits of reducing leakage support routine diversion in TME, its necessity in PME remains questionable.
Aim To investigate the conflicting consequences of faecal diversion on stoma outcomes and anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer, including interaction effects determined by the extent of mesorectal excision. Method Anterior resections between 2007 and 2016 were identified using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. National Patient Registry data were added to determine stoma outcome 2 years after surgery. Tumour distance from the anal verge constituted a proxy for extent of mesorectal excision [total mesorectal excision (TME): <= 10 cm; partial mesorectal excision (PME): 13-15 cm]. With confounder-adjusted probit regression, the total effect of defunctioning stoma on permanent stoma, and the interaction effect of extent of mesorectal excision, were estimated together with the indirect effect through anastomotic leakage. Baseline risks, risk differences (RDs) and relative risks (RRs) were reported. Results The main study cohort included 4529 patients. Defunctioning stomas influenced the absolute permanent stoma risk (TME: RD 0.11 [95% CI 0.09-0.13]; PME: RD 0.15 [95% CI 0.13-0.16]). The baseline risk was higher in TME, with a resulting greater RR in PME (2.23 [95% CI 1.43-3.02] vs 4.36 [95% CI 3.05-5.68]). The indirect reduction in permanent stoma rates, due to the alleviating effect of faecal diversion on anastomotic leakage, was small (TME: 0.89 [95% CI 0.81-0.96]; PME: 0.96 [95% CI 0.91-1.00]). Conclusion In anterior resection for rectal cancer, defunctioning stomas may reduce chances of a stoma-free outcome. Considering leakage reduction benefits, consequences of routine diversion in TME might be fairly balanced, while this seems questionable in PME.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available