4.2 Article

Effect of water in color changes of historical paintings

Journal

COLOR RESEARCH AND APPLICATION
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 1265-1275

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/col.22683

Keywords

cleaning; conservation; contact angle; particle size; wetting

Funding

  1. Italian MIUR through PON-DELIAS [PON03PE_00214_2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water can serve as a substitute for organic solvents and other cleaning tools in the conservation and restoration of historical paintings. The research assesses the wetting characteristics and quantifies the impact of water absorption on color changes for historical paintings, emphasizing the importance of binder and surface topography in these processes.
In conservation and cleaning of historical paintings, the use of water was discouraged because of its effects in terms of swelling and leaching of pictorial materials and of color modification. Nevertheless, water can represent a good substitute of organic solvents and of other tools recently employed for cleaning and restoration. The research article assesses the wetting characteristics and to quantifies the effect of the water absorption on the color changes for historical paintings. For these purposes, different typologies of painting mock-ups have been prepared in the laboratory to reproduce the main antique pictorial techniques. The results highlighted that the binder played an important function in the wetting properties assessed by contact angle measurement. The water absorption tests underlined that the topography of the painting surface strongly influenced the water absorption. The data have been correlated to colorimetric measurements to quantify the color alteration induced by water. This quantification is important to define the role of water-based products in cleaning and conservation procedures. The water, in fact, could be a good tool of green chemistry to save the health of the restorer and the environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available