4.7 Review

3D printing of PEEK and its composite to increase biointerfaces as a biomedical material- A review

Journal

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
Volume 203, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111726

Keywords

PEEK; 3D printing; Cellular CHAp; Biomaterial; Bone implant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research showcases the potential of PEEK material in medical applications, emphasizing its biological macromolecular behaviors as a bone implant material and the optimal 3D printing process for PEEK and CHAp in medical applications.
Poly ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) is a polymer with better lignin biocompatibility than other polymers. It is good for biomedical engineering applications. This research summarises the outcomes of an evaluation conducted on PEEK material composites, such as cellular calcium hydroxyapatite (CHAp) for medical applications. Prospects of PEEK for medical implant are highlighted. Critical analysis and review on 3D printing of PEEK, CHAp and their biological macromolecular behaviours are presented. An electronic search was carried out on Scupos database, Google search and peer-reviewed papers published in the last ten years. Because of the extraordinary strength and biological behaviours of PEEK and its composite of CHAp, 3D-printed PEEK has several biomedical applications, and its biological macromolecular behaviour leads to health sustainability. This work highlights its biological macromolecular behaviours as a bone implant material and the optimum 3D printing process for PEEK and CHAp for medical applications. The current problems with printing PEEK and CHAp are investigated along with their possible uses. Possible solutions to improve the 3D printability of PEEK and CHAp are explained based on scientific mechanisms. This detailed report stands to benefit both scientific community and medical industry to enhance 3D printing concepts for PEEK and CHAp.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available