4.3 Article

Investigating interactive effects of worry and the catechol-o-methyltransferase gene (COMT) on working memory performance

Journal

COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 1153-1163

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.3758/s13415-021-00922-9

Keywords

Worry; Working memory; Catechol-o-methyltransferase gene (COMT); N-back; Dopamine; Anxiety

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [1R01MH108511-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that worry is associated with reduced working memory, and dopamine in the prefrontal cortex heavily influences the stability of mental representations during working memory tasks. By using the COMT gene as a proxy for dopamine levels, the research demonstrated that basal dopamine plays an important role in how increases in worry negatively impact working memory performance over time.
Extant research indicates that worry is associated with reduced working memory. It remains unclear, however, what mechanisms contribute to impaired performance in worriers. Critically, dopamine in the prefrontal cortex heavily influences the stability of mental representations during working memory tasks, yet no research has probed its role in associations between worry and working memory. To address this gap, the current study was designed to examine the moderating role of dopamine on the association between worry and working memory, using the catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT) gene as a proxy for basal levels of dopamine. Across four assessments, we examined within- and between-person variation in worry and its interactive effects with COMT to predict working memory performance. Within-person variation in worry interacted with COMT to predict accuracy, such that higher worry across time predicted less accuracy for homozygous Val carriers but not Met carriers. Our findings demonstrate that basal dopamine plays an important role in how increases in worry across time for an individual negatively impact working memory performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available