4.5 Article

Efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke spasticity: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Journal

CLINICAL REHABILITATION
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 158-171

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/02692155211038097

Keywords

Transcranial direct current stimulation; stroke; muscle spasticity; meta-analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. Study and Application of Active Rehabilitation Technology for Cerebrovascular Disease based on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI), National Key RD Plan [2017YFC1308504, 2017YFC1308500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, especially when combined with other therapies and applied for more than 20 minutes, is effective in improving upper limb post-stroke spasticity. Transcranial direct current stimulation is superior to control treatments for subacute and chronic stroke patients under 60. Further high-quality studies are needed to assess its long-term efficacy and safety.
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke spasticity and to assess its evidence using a meta-analysis. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE (via PubMed), PEDro, CBM, CNKI and Wan Fang Data from their inception to June 2021 for randomised clinical trials published in English or Chinese, which aimed to explore the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on post-stroke spasticity. Two reviewers independently extracted the data and evaluated the methodological quality and overall evidence quality. Results: Thirteen randomised clinical trials comprising 924 patients were included, 12 of which were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that anodal stimulation (standard mean difference = -0.91; [95% CI; -1.63 to -0.19]) combined with other therapies was more effective in improving upper limb spasticity. More than 20 minutes of stimulation were found to be effective in improving spasticity. Transcranial direct current stimulation was superior to the control treatments for subacute (standard mean difference = -1.16; -1.75 to -0.57) and chronic stroke (standard mean difference = -0.68; -1.13 to -0.22) patients aged under 60 (standard mean difference = -1.07; -1.54 to -0.60). No severe adverse events were reported in any of the included studies. Conclusions: Low-quality evidence demonstrates that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation as an adjunct is effective and safe in reducing upper limb post-stroke spasticity when applied for more than 20 minutes in subacute and chronic stroke survivors aged under 60. Further high-quality studies are needed to explore its long-term efficacy and safety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available