4.0 Article

Non-invasive quantification of pressure-volume loops from cardiovascular magnetic resonance at rest and during dobutamine stress

Journal

CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages 467-470

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12718

Keywords

contractility; stress; stroke work; validation; ventricular efficiency

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Heart Lung Foundation
  2. Region of Skane, Lund University
  3. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study improved and validated a method for non-invasive analysis of PV loops, providing a more accurate diagnostic tool for cardiovascular diseases in a wider range of study cohorts, not only in resting state but also under stress conditions.
Non-invasive quantification of pressure-volume (PV) loops from brachial pressure and cardiovascular magnetic resonance is a validated method but its application has been limited to resting heart rates. The aim of this study was to improve the previous method and validate it against invasive left-ventricular pressure measurements in an experimental porcine model, and further apply it to 16 healthy humans at rest and during dobutamine stress. In addition, the improved method calculates the arterial elastance which provides the computation of the ratio of effective arterial (E-a) to maximal ventricular elastance (E-max) representing the ventricular-arterial coupling. In the porcine model, the differences between the improved non-invasively derived PV loops and invasively measured PV loops were for stroke work (mean +/- SD) 0.00 +/- 0.03 J, ventricular efficiency -1.1 +/- 0.4%, and contractility 1.1 +/- 0.1 mmHg/ml. In human subjects during dobutamine stress, stroke work increased from 1.3 +/- 0.3 to 1.7 +/- 0.4 J, ventricular efficiency from 71 +/- 4 to 82 +/- 4%, contractility from 1.3 +/- 0.2 to 2.3 +/- 0.6 mmHg/ml, and the ratio of arterial to ventricular elastance decreased from 0.96 to 0.56. The improved method for non-invasive PV loops constitutes a more robust diagnostic tool for cardiac disease states in a wider range of study cohorts at both rest and during stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available