4.5 Article

Precision of orthodontic cephalometric measurements on ultra low dose-low dose CBCT reconstructed cephalograms

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 1543-1550

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04127-9

Keywords

Cephalometry; Cone beam computed tomography; Orthodontics; Diagnosis; Accuracy; Variation; Reliability

Funding

  1. Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen
  2. Department of Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen
  3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study analyzed the variation in orthodontic diagnostic measurements on lateral cephalograms reconstructed from ULD-LD CBCT scans compared to standard lateral cephalograms. Results showed that there were small differences in variation between the two imaging methods, supporting the use of ULD-LD CBCT with reconstructed lateral cephalograms for orthodontic diagnostic purposes due to the lower radiation dose.
Objectives To analyze differences in variation of orthodontic diagnostic measurements on lateral cephalograms reconstructed from ultra low dose-low dose (ULD-LD) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans (RLC) as compared to variation of measurements on standard lateral cephalograms (SLC), and to determine if it is justifiable to replace a traditional orthodontic image set for an ULD-LD CBCT with a reconstructed lateral cephalogram. Material and methods ULD-LD CBCT images and SLCs were made of forty-three dry human skulls. From the ULD-LD CBCT dataset, a lateral cephalogram was reconstructed (RLC). Cephalometric landmarks (13 skeletal and 7 dental) were identified on both SLC and RLC twice in two sessions by two calibrated observers. Thirteen cephalometric variables were calculated. Variations of measurements, expressed as standard deviations of the 4 measurements on SLC and RLC, were analyzed using a paired sample t-test. Differences in the number of observations deviating >= 2.0 mm or degrees from the grand mean between SLC and RLC were analyzed using a McNemar test. Results Mean SDs for 7 out of 13 variables were significantly smaller for SLCs than those for RLCs, but differences were small. For 9 out of 13 variables, there was no significant difference between SLC and RLC for the number of measurements outside the range of 2 mm or degrees. Conclusions Based on the lower radiation dose and the small differences in variation in cephalometric measurements on reconstructed LC compared to standard dose LC, ULD-LD CBCT with reconstructed LC should be considered for orthodontic diagnostic purposes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available