4.3 Article

Utility of WAIS-IV Digit Span indices as measures of performance validity in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 1950-1963

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1921277

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury; Digit Span; performance validity; malingering

Funding

  1. National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) [90IFOO92, 90DPTB0006]
  2. Wayne State University Graduate School Thesis and Dissertation grants
  3. NIDILRR [90DPTB0006, 1004323] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In individuals with moderate-to-severe TBI, DS-derived PVTs showed comparable discriminability, but the traditional RDS demonstrated the best classification accuracy in terms of specificity/sensitivity balance. Individuals with TBI were more likely to perseverate on prior instructions during DS Sequencing.
Objective: The addition of Sequencing to WAIS-IV Digit Span (DS) brought about new Reliable Digit Span (RDS) indices and an Age-Corrected Scaled Score that includes Sequencing trials. Reports have indicated that these new performance validity tests (PVTs) are superior to the traditional RDS; however, comparisons in the context of known neurocognitive impairment are sparse. This study compared DS-derived PVT classification accuracies in a design that included adults with verified TBI. Methods: Participants included 64 adults with moderate-to-severe TBI (TBI), 51 healthy adults coached to simulate TBI (SIM), and 78 healthy comparisons (HC). Participants completed the WAIS-IV DS subtest in the context of a larger test battery. Results: Kruskal-Wallis tests indicated that all DS indices differed significantly across groups. Post hoc contrasts revealed that only RDS Forward and the traditional RDS differed significantly between SIM and TBI. ROC analyses indicated that RDS variables were comparable predictors of SIM vs. HC; however, the traditional RDS showed the highest sensitivity when approximating 90% specificity for SIM vs. TBI. A greater percentage of TBI scored RDS Sequencing < 1 compared to SIM and HC. Conclusion: In the context of moderate-to-severe TBI, the DS-derived PVTs showed comparable discriminability. However, the Greiffenstein et al. traditional RDS demonstrated the best classification accuracy with respect to specificity/sensitivity balance. This relative superiority may reflect that individuals with verified TBI are more likely to perseverate on prior instructions during DS Sequencing. Findings highlight the importance of including individuals with verified TBI when evaluating and developing PVTs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available