Journal
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 132, Issue 9, Pages 2199-2207Publisher
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.06.015
Keywords
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); Electric field modeling; Finite element method; Motor threshold; Personalized dosing; Tobacco use disorder
Categories
Funding
- U.S. NIH/NIDA [1R21DA036752-01A1]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study found that 120% rMT stimulation over the DLPFC in TMS delivers sub-motor equivalent electric fields. The high interindividual variability in electric fields supports the use of personalized electric field modeling to ensure appropriate stimulation.
Objective: In this study, we reexamined the use of 120% resting motor threshold (rMT) dosing for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) using electric field modeling. Methods: We computed electric field models in 38 tobacco use disorder (TUD) participants to compare figure-8 coil induced electric fields at 100% rMT over the primary motor cortex (M1), and 100% and 120% rMT over the DLPFC. We then calculated the percentage of rMT needed for motor-equivalent induced electric fields at the DLPFC and modeled this intensity for each person. Results: Electric fields from 100% rMT stimulation over Ml were significantly larger than what was modeled in the DLPFC using 100% rMT (p < 0.001) and 120% rMT stimulation (p = 0.013). On average, TMS would need to be delivered at 133.5% rMT (range = 79.9 to 247.5%) to produce motor-equivalent induced electric fields at the DLPFC of 158.2 V/m. Conclusions: TMS would have to be applied at an average of 133.5% rMT over the left DLPFC to produce equivalent electric fields to 100% rMT stimulation over M1 in these 38 TUD patients. The high interindividual variability between motor and prefrontal electric fields for each participant supports using personalized electric field modeling for TMS dosing to ensure that each participant is not under- or over-stimulated. Significance: These electric field modeling in TUD data suggest that 120% rMT stimulation over the DLPFC delivers sub-motor equivalent electric fields in many individuals (73.7%). With further validation, electric field modeling may be an impactful method of individually dosing TMS. (C) 2021 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available