4.3 Review

Progress in understanding the safety and efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages 1047-1057

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1744666X.2016.1189826

Keywords

JAK inhibitors; RA; dendritic cell; T cell; B cell

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  3. University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
  4. UOEH
  5. Mitsubishi-Tanabe
  6. Eisai
  7. Chugai
  8. Abbott Japan
  9. Astellas
  10. Daiichi-Sankyo
  11. Abbvie
  12. Janssen
  13. Pfizer
  14. Takeda
  15. Astra-Zeneca
  16. Eli Lilly Japan
  17. GlaxoSmithKline
  18. Quintiles
  19. MSD
  20. Asahi-Kasei
  21. Bristol-Myers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has improved considerably following the advent of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). However, these drugs require special storage and transportation. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are oral synthetic DMARDs that inhibit the non-receptor tyrosine kinase family Janus kinase. Recently, many JAK inhibitors are being developed as new therapies for patients with RA.Areas covered: In this article, we mainly review the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors currently under investigation. Tofacitinib has already been approved in 43 countries except in the EU. Results of three JAK inhibitors (baricitinib, decernotinib, and peficitinib) in phase III are consistent with that of tofacitinib. Tofacitinib and baricitinib were partially effective in patients who had an inadequate response to biological DMARDs.Expert commentary: JAK kinase inhibitors provide a new therapeutic approach for rheumatoid arthritis. Meanwhile, further studies are needed to determine their risk-benefit ratio and the most appropriate patients suitable for such therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available