4.7 Review

The Incubation Period Distribution of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 73, Issue 12, Pages 2344-2352

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab501

Keywords

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; incubation period; systematic review; meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Health and Medical Research Fund, Food and Health Bureau, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region [COVID190118]
  2. AIR@innoHK program of the Innovation and Technology Commission of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the pooled median estimates of the mean, median, and 95th percentile for the incubation period of COVID-19 are 6.3 days, 5.4 days, and 13.1 days respectively. The estimates were significantly shorter before the epidemic peak in China compared to after, and variances were noticed for different methodological approaches.
Incubation period is an important parameter to inform quarantine period and to study transmission dynamics of infectious diseases. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on published estimates of the incubation period distribution of coronavirus disease 2019, and showed that the pooled median of the point estimates of the mean, median and 95th percentile for incubation period are 6.3 days (range, 1.8-11.9 days), 5.4 days (range, 2.0-17.9 days), and 13.1 days (range, 3.2-17.8 days), respectively. Estimates of the mean and 95th percentile of the incubation period distribution were considerably shorter before the epidemic peak in China compared to after the peak, and variation was also noticed for different choices of methodological approach in estimation. Our findings implied that corrections may be needed before directly applying estimates of incubation period into control of or further studies on emerging infectious diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available