4.7 Article

Impact of Antibiotic Stewardship Rounds in the Intensive Care Setting: A Prospective Cluster-Randomized Crossover Study

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 74, Issue 11, Pages 1986-1992

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab747

Keywords

antibiotic stewardship; handshake stewardship; intensive care unit; ICU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Weekly multidisciplinary antibiotic stewardship rounds in the intensive care units were associated with a small reduction in antibiotic use, with differential effects observed among specialty units. Customizing antibiotic stewardship rounds to match unit-specific population, workflow, and culture is important for maximizing effectiveness.
Background Few groups have formally studied the effect of dedicated antibiotic stewardship rounds (ASRs) on antibiotic use (AU) in intensive care units (ICUs). Methods We implemented weekly ASRs using a 2-arm, cluster-randomized, crossover study in 5 ICUs at Duke University Hospital from November 2017 to June 2018. We excluded patients without an active antibiotic order, or if they had a marker of high complexity including an existing infectious disease consult, transplantation, ventricular assist device, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. AU during and following ICU stay for patients with ASRs was compared to the controls. We recorded the number of reviews, recommendations delivered, and responses. We evaluated change in ICU-specific AU during and after the study. Results Our analysis included 4683 patients: 2330 intervention and 2353 controls. Teams performed 761 reviews during ASRs, which excluded 1569 patients: 60% of patients off antibiotics, and 8% complex patients. Exclusions affected 88% of cardiothoracic ICU (CTICU) patients. The AU rate ratio (RR) was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], .91-1.04). When CTICU was removed, the RR was 0.93 (95% CI, .89-.98). AU in the poststudy period decreased by 16% (95% CI, 11%-24%) compared to AU in the baseline period. Change in AU was differential among units: largest in the neurology ICU (-28%) and smallest in the CTICU (-2%). Conclusions Weekly multidisciplinary ASRs was a high-resource intervention associated with a small AU reduction. The noticeable ICU AU decline over time is possibly due to indirect effects of ASRs. Effects differed among specialty ICUs, emphasizing the importance of customizing ASRs to match unit-specific population, workflow, and culture. Antibiotic stewardship rounds in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting can address a high-risk population where antibiotics are frequently used. While antibiotic use did decrease with stewardship rounds, effects varied across ICUs of different specialties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available