4.7 Review

Neutrophil extracellular traps and organ dysfunction in sepsis

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 523, Issue -, Pages 152-162

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.09.012

Keywords

Disease; Sepsis; NETs; Organ Failure; COVID-19; Inflammation; Therapeutics

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Science Engineering Research Board [YSS/2015/000846]
  2. New Delhi, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article highlights the role of NETs in sepsis-induced organ failure, and discusses current therapeutic strategies to intercept the harmful effects of NETs in order to restore organ function.
Sepsis is a clinical syndrome resulting from infection followed by inflammation and is one of the significant causes of mortality worldwide. The underlying reason is the host's uncontrolled inflammatory response due to an infection led to multiple organ dysfunction/failure. Neutrophils, an innate immune cell, are forerunners to reach the site of infection/inflammation for clearing the infection and resolute the inflammation during sepsis. A relatively new neutrophil effector function, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), have been demonstrated to kill the pathogens by releasing DNA decorated with histone and granular proteins. A growing number of pieces of shreds of evidence suggest that unregulated incidence of NETs have a significant influence on the pathogenesis of sepsis-induced multiple organ damage, including arterial hypotension, hypoxemia, coagulopathy, renal, neurological, and hepatic dysfunction. Thus, excessive production and improper resolution of NETs are of significant therapeutic value in combating sepsis-induced multiple organ failure. The purpose of this review is intended to highlight the role of NETs in sepsis-induced organ failure. Furthermore, the current status of therapeutic strategies to intersect the harmful effects of NETs to restore organ functions is discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available