4.5 Article

Adaptive mitigation strategies hedge against extreme climate futures

Journal

CLIMATIC CHANGE
Volume 166, Issue 3-4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-021-03132-x

Keywords

Climate risk management; Adaptive mitigation pathways; Integrated assessment modelling; Multi-objective optimization; Direct policy search

Funding

  1. Politecnico di Milano within the CRUI-CARE Agreement
  2. National Science Foundation through the Network for Sustainable Climate Risk Management (SCRiM) [GEO-1240507]
  3. European Research Council under the European Union
  4. ERC [336155]
  5. H2020 European Commission Project NAVIGATE [821124]
  6. Penn State Center for Climate Risk Management
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [336155] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper discusses the challenges in designing global mitigation strategies to address climate change threats, as well as the benefits of using information feedback from observed global temperature changes to improve economic and environmental performance. Adaptive strategies can effectively reduce high regrets, protecting against excessive mitigation spending for less sensitive climate futures, and excessive warming for more sensitive ones.
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change agreed to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change, in the context of sustainable development and efforts to eradicate poverty (UNFCCC 2015). Designing a global mitigation strategy to support this goal poses formidable challenges. For one, there are trade-offs between the economic costs and the environmental benefits of averting climate impacts. Furthermore, the coupled human-Earth systems are subject to deep and dynamic uncertainties. Previous economic analyses typically addressed either the former, introducing multiple objectives, or the latter, making mitigation actions responsive to new information. This paper aims at bridging these two separate strands of literature. We demonstrate how information feedback from observed global temperature changes can jointly improve the economic and environmental performance of mitigation strategies. We focus on strategies that maximize discounted expected utility while also minimizing warming above 2 degrees C, damage costs, and mitigation costs. Expanding on the Dynamic Integrated Climate-Economy (DICE) model and previous multi-objective efforts, we implement closed-loop control strategies, map the emerging trade-offs and quantify the value of the temperature information feedback under both well-characterized and deep climate uncertainties. Adaptive strategies strongly reduce high regrets, guarding against mitigation overspending for less sensitive climate futures, and excessive warming for more sensitive ones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available