4.7 Article

The Last Breath Historical Controversies Surrounding Determination of Cardiopulmonary Death

Journal

CHEST
Volume 161, Issue 2, Pages 514-518

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.08.006

Keywords

brain death; death determination; medical history; organ transplantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article tracks the evolution of the tripartite death examination and highlights the ad hoc nature of cardiopulmonary death determination despite advances in diagnostics and legislative attempts to standardize the definition of death.
Cardiopulmonary determination of death is a mainstay of the practice of internal medicine and pulmonary physicians. Despite this, there is considerable variability in death examinations. This article tracks the evolution of the tripartite death examination, initially developed in the middle of the 19th century to protect against premature burial. Although the societal context for controversies about death determination has shifted to discussions about end-of-life care in ICUs and organ transplantation, the cardiopulmonary death examination has largely remained unchanged from its original formulation. The recognition of coma depasse and brain death has further pushed the focus of the death examination onto the neurological system. Despite advancing diagnostics and legislative attempts to standardize the definition of death, cardiopulmonary death determination largely remains an ad hoc process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available