4.7 Article

A Novel Approach to Equitable Distribution of Scarce Therapeutics Institutional Experience Implementing a Reserve System for Allocation of COVID-19 Monoclonal Antibodies

Journal

CHEST
Volume 160, Issue 6, Pages 2324-2331

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.08.003

Keywords

KEY WORDS; allocation; COVID-19; ethics; lottery; monoclonal antibodies; Vulnerability Index

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to investigate the successful deployment of a reserve system in a large health system to promote equitable access to mAb therapy among socially vulnerable patients. Despite operational challenges, the reserve system effectively increased the number of socially vulnerable patients offered and received mAb therapy.
BACKGROUND: In fall 2020, the Food and Drug Administration issued emergency use authorization for monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies for outpatients with COVID-19. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts issued guidance outlining the use of a reserve system with a lottery for allocation of mAbs in the event of scarcity that would prioritize socially vulnerable patients for 20% of the infusion slots. The Mass General Brigham health system subsequently implemented such a reserve system. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can a reserve system be deployed successfully in a large health system in a way that promotes equitable access to mAb therapy among socially vulnerable patients STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the operation of the reserve system for allocation of mAb therapies to identify how referrals moved through the allocation process and what proportion of patients who were offered and received mAb therapies were socially vulnerable. RESULTS: Notwithstanding multiple operational challenges, the reserve system for allocation of mAb therapy worked as intended to enhance the number of socially vulnerable patients who were offered and received mAb therapy. A significantly higher proportion of patients offered mAb therapy were socially vulnerable (27.0%) than would have been the case if the infusion appointments had been allocated using a pure lottery system without a vulnerable reserve (19.8%), and a significantly higher proportion of patient who received infusions were socially vulnerable (25.3%) than would have been the case if the infusion appointments had been allocated using a pure lottery system (17.6%) INTERPRETATION: Our health system experience demonstrates that a reserve system with a lottery for tiebreaking is a viable way to distribute scarce therapeutics when enhancing access for certain groups is desirable. CHEST 2021; 160(6):2324-2331

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available