4.3 Review

Clozapine's critical role in treatment resistant schizophrenia: ensuring both safety and use

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages 1193-1203

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2016.1191468

Keywords

Clozapine; treatment resistant schizophrenia; side effects; neutropenia agranulocytosis; myocarditis; bowel obstruction

Funding

  1. Novartis
  2. Neurocrine Biosciences
  3. Synchroneuron
  4. Roche
  5. Janssen Ortho (Johnson Johnson)
  6. Sunovion
  7. Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Clozapine was first introduced as an antipsychotic in the 1970's but a cluster of deaths, later linked to the drug's risk of agranulocytosis, led to its withdrawal in most countries. However, work in the 1980's established its unique efficacy in treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS), which constitutes as many as 30% of those with the illness. Clozapine was reintroduced with this indication shortly thereafter, but because of this risk its use requires routine hematologic monitoring. Areas covered: An update is provided regarding clozapine's risk of neutropenia, agranulocytosis, and associated mortality. In addition, updates are provided on other side effects, specifically myocarditis and bowel obstruction, as evidence suggests these are more common than agranulocytosis and associated with higher mortality rates. Expert opinion: Clozapine remains the only treatment indicated in TRS, but it is dramatically under-utilized. Clearly there are serious side effects associated with its use, and while the focus has historically been on hematologic concerns, we highlight other side effects that also demand systematic monitoring. Because it is the only effective treatment option we have for TRS, though, efforts must be implemented that ensure its use in this population while maximizing safety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available