4.8 Review

Artificial Intelligence Applied to Battery Research: Hype or Reality?

Journal

CHEMICAL REVIEWS
Volume 122, Issue 12, Pages 10899-10969

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00108

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union [772873, 957213, 957189, 875247]
  2. Alistore-ERI
  3. Swedish Energy Agency [P43525-1, P39909-1]
  4. VINNOVA -Sweden's Innovation Agency
  5. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion of Spain [PID2019-106519RB-I00]
  6. VILLUM FONDEN [00023105]
  7. Institut Universitaire de France
  8. French National Research Agency through the Labex STORE-EX project [ANR-10-LABX-76-01]
  9. Swedish Energy Agency (SEA) [P39909-1] Funding Source: Swedish Energy Agency (SEA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article is a critical review of the application of artificial intelligence/machine learning methods in battery research. It aims to provide a comprehensive and authoritative review that is easily understandable to the battery community. The review discusses the concepts, approaches, tools, outcomes, and challenges of using AI/ML to accelerate the design and optimization of the next generation of batteries, and intends to make these tools accessible to the chemistry and electrochemical energy sciences communities while covering various aspects of battery R&D.
This is a critical review of artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) methods applied to battery research. It aims at providing a comprehensive, authoritative, and critical, yet easily understandable, review of general interest to the battery community. It addresses the concepts, approaches, tools, outcomes, and challenges of using AI/ML as an accelerator for the design and optimization of the next generation of batteries-a current hot topic. It intends to create both accessibility of these tools to the chemistry and electrochemical energy sciences communities and completeness in terms of the different battery R&D aspects covered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available