4.6 Article

Regeneration performance and particulate emission characteristics during active regeneration process of GPF with ash loading

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 248, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.117114

Keywords

Particulate filter; Ash particle size; Regeneration; Ash loading; Total particle mass concentration emission; Regeneration efficiency

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52076182, 51676167]
  2. Science AMP
  3. Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2019YJ0594, 2021YJ0332]
  4. Graduate Innovation Fund of Xihua Univer-sity [YCJJ2020071]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the effects of ash particle size and loading on particle emission characteristics during GPF regeneration, revealing that different sizes and types of ash have varied impacts on regeneration efficiency and particle emissions.
The deposited ash has an important effect on the regeneration of GPF, this paper aims to study the effects of ash particle size and loading on particle emission characteristics. The results indicates that the depos-ited carbon black particles are easy to be blown out during heating stage and local high temperature leads to 3 orders of magnitude of emitted particles during regeneration stage. The pure Al2O3 ash#1 (2 lm) inhibit the release of particles during heating stage and also promotes regeneration efficiency, resuliting in high total emitted particle mass concentration during regeneration stage. While the impacts of the pure Al2O3 ash#2 (15 lm) is opposite to ash#1. As the loading of mixed particle Al2O3 + SiO2 ash#3 (low thermal conductivity) increases from 5 g/L to 15 g/L, particles are more likely to be blown out because of the coupling of the ash layer and filter wall, and the exhaust particles at GPF outlet also decrease, mainly distributing in large-size aggregated particles (50-100 nm) during the regeneration stage. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available