4.6 Article

Continuous separation of puerarin from Pueraria crude extract by fractional Extraction: Simulation and optimization

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 240, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.116671

Keywords

Puerarin; Fractional extraction; Selective separation; Chinese herbal medicines

Funding

  1. Innovation Research Group Project of Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2020JJ1004]
  2. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department [20A227]
  3. Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate [CX20201113]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fractional extraction was used to separate puerarin from crude Pueraria extract, with high purity of 98.0% achieved through two-step fractional extraction. This method is effective for accurately separating active ingredients in Chinese herbal medicine on a commercial scale.
Fractional extraction was conducted to accurately separate puerarin from the crude Pueraria extract. Two green, efficient extraction systems of pure solvents were explored for the successive purification of puerarin by fractional extraction. The extraction systems of pure solvents do not involve chemical reactions, which is beneficial for product recovery and solvent reuse. A mathematical model of fractional extraction was established to investigate the effect of various parameters on extraction performance, including the organic/water phase ratio and the number of stages. The residual rate was proposed to assess the purity of puerarin. By simulation and optimization, the optimal parameters can be determined. Puerarin with high purity of 98.0% was continuously obtained by two-step fractional extraction in two cascades of 10 CCSs. Fractional extraction is an effective method for the accurate separation of active ingredients in Chinese herbal medicine on a commercial scale. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available