4.6 Article

Analysis of flocculation in a jet clarifier. Part 1-Global and local hydrodynamic analysis

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages 380-391

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2021.09.007

Keywords

Jet clarifier; Hydrodynamics; Particle image velocimetry; Velocity gradient

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a quasi-two-dimensional jet clarifier was developed to facilitate hydrodynamic analysis of the flocculation zone. PIV data was used to visualize the circulation and shear rate induced by the jet, with the parameter Gt shown to be constant around 30,000 for different jet flow rates. This suggests that the efficiency of such jet clarifier can be predicted.
Jet clarifier combines jet hydrodynamics, flocculation and settling in a unit operation. Generally, Camp and Stein G t parameter is recommended to evaluate clarifier efficiency, where G stands for a global velocity gradient and t a characteristic time scale (contact time). In this work, a quasi-two-dimensional jet clarifier is developed to make easier the hydrodynamic analysis of the flocculation zone of a jet clarifier. Measurements of instantaneous velocity field are performed by means of particle image velocimetry (PIV). PIV data are processed to visualise the strong circulation induced by the jet in the flocculation zone. Characteristic time scales related to macromixing are then extracted. Based on PIV data processing, local and instantaneous shear rate are estimated. The analysis of space averaged velocity gradient G is presented. The range of G is 2-15 s-1 whereas the residence time decreases from 4 to 1 h. Based on the hydrodynamic analysis, the parameter Gt is shown to be constant around 30,000 for different jet flow rates. Efficiency of such jet clarifier can thus be foreseen. (c) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available