4.5 Article

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in patients with triple-negative breast cancer

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages 71-80

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3293-7

Keywords

Triple-negative breast cancer; BRCA1; BRCA2; Germline mutations; Prevalence; Genetic testing

Categories

Funding

  1. National Breast Cancer Foundation (NBCF), Australia
  2. Hunter Translational Cancer Research Centre
  3. Cancer Institute New South Wales
  4. National Breast Cancer Foundation [IF-12-05] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) lack expression of oestrogen, progesterone and HER2 receptors. The gene expression profiles of TNBCs are similar to those of breast tumours in women with BRCA1 mutations. Reports to date indicate that up to 20 % of TNBC patients harbour germline BRCA mutations; however, the prevalence of BRCA mutations in TNBC patients varies widely between countries and from study to study. We studied 774 women with triple-negative breast cancer, diagnosed on average at age 58.0 years. Samples of genomic DNA were provided by the Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank (ABCTB) (439 patients) and by the Department of Genetics and Pathology of the Pomeranian Medical University (335 patients). The entire coding regions and the exon-intron boundaries of BRCA1 and BRCA2 were amplified and sequenced by next-generation sequencing. We identified a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation in 74 of 774 (9.6 %) triple-negative patients. The mutation prevalence was 9.3 % in Australia and was 9.9 % in Poland. In both countries, the mean age of diagnoses of BRCA1 mutation carriers was significantly lower than that of non-carriers, while the age of onset of BRCA2 mutation carriers was similar to that of non-carriers. In the Australian cohort, 59 % of the mutation-positive patients did not have a family history of breast or ovarian cancer, and would not have qualified for genetic testing. The triple-negative phenotype should be added as a criterion to genetic screening guidelines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available