4.5 Article

Segregation in magnetized fluidized bed with Geldart-B magnetizable and nonmagnetizable particles

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2021.108421

Keywords

magnetized fluidized bed; mixture; magnetization-LAST; segregation; size difference; density difference

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21808232]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed that in magnetized fluidized beds, particle size and density differences affect segregation phenomena, with an increase in gas velocity leading to higher required magnetic field intensity. Smaller and lighter magnetizable particles require a stronger magnetic field to prevent segregation under the magnetization-LAST operation mode.
For magnetized fluidized beds with Geldart-B magnetizable and nonmagnetizable particles operated under the magnetization-LAST mode, segregation occurs and deepens as the magnetic field intensity increases. This work aimed to explore the effects of particle size and density difference on such segregation. The field intensities (His and Hcs) for the segregation to initiate and complete increased as the gas velocity (Ug) increased. Moreover, their increases were steeper at higher gas velocities. The increase of Ug raised not only the collision to the magnetic chains but also their mixing tendency with the nonmagnetizable particles. For the given nonmagnetizable particles and Ug, His and Hcs increased as the size or density of the magnetizable particles decreased, indicating that it was more difficult for the segregation to occur and complete. Additionally, the smaller/lighter the magnetizable particles, the steeper the variations of His and Hcs with Ug. A much stronger magnetic field was required for more of such magnetizable particles to form the desired magnetic chains and keep the desired size. Segregation could only be postponed but completely prevented under the magnetization-LAST operation mode however the two types of particles were matched.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available