4.4 Article

Analysis of Hydrocyclone Geometry via Rapid Optimization Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 9, Pages 1693-1707

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.202100121

Keywords

Computational cost; Computational fluid dynamics; Hydrocyclone; Numerical simulation; Optimization

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council [201908230337]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project of China [2018YFE0196000]
  3. Natural Science Foundation (Key Projects) of Heilongjiang Province, China [ZD2020E001]
  4. Supporting Project for Longjiang Scholars of Northeast Petroleum University, China [lj201803]
  5. United States Department of Energy (CERC-WET Project) [2.5]
  6. Water-Energy Nexus (WEX) Center of the University of California, Irvine USA
  7. Santa Margarita Water District

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrocyclones use density gradients for centrifugal separation of dispersions in liquid, with optimization usually based on computational fluid dynamics that has long computational times. A new rapid optimization method, DUOM, reduced computational time by 31.1% compared to the common SFOM method.
Hydrocyclones exploit density gradients for the centrifugal separation of dispersions in a continuous liquid. Selection of the geometrics for optimal separation is case specific, like the media characteristics. The existing optimization method based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) provides a powerful analytical tool but requires long computational times. The most common praxis for CFD optimization is via the single-factor optimization method (SFOM). In this study, a novel approach is presented as an improved rapid optimization method that implements a dynamic-mesh and user-defined function optimization method (DUOM). The DUOM adapts the dynamic-mesh approach from other applications to the optimization analysis of hydrocyclones. The DUOM reduced the computational time by 31.1 %, compared to the SFOM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available