4.4 Article

Design, synthesis, and structure-activity relationship studies of the anaephene antibiotics

Journal

CHEMICAL BIOLOGY & DRUG DESIGN
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 295-304

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.13903

Keywords

antibiotics; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; natural products; Staphylococcus aureus; synthesis

Funding

  1. College of Arts and Sciences (ISU)
  2. Department of Chemistry (ISU)
  3. National Science Foundation MRI Program [CHE 1337497]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, researchers synthesized a library of analogues to explore the structure-activity relationships of the natural products. They found compound 7 to be 4-fold more potent against MRSA than the natural product, and identified a 2-hydroxypyridine analogue with equal potency but significantly reduced hemolytic activity.
The natural products, anaephenes A (1) and B (2), were found to have antimicrobial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In this report, we expanded on our previous synthetic efforts by preparing a library of eighteen analogues in order to understand the structure-activity relationships (SAR) of this interesting class of natural products. These analogues were selected to explore the biological impact of structural variations in the alkyl chain and on the phenol moiety. Last, we further assessed the biological activity of anaephene B (2) and two additional analogues against other clinically relevant bacterial strains and the hemolytic activity of each and determined that these compounds act via a bactericidal mechanism. These studies led to the identification of compound 7, which was 4-fold more potent than the natural product (2) against MRSA (2 vs. 8 mu g/ml) and a 2-hydroxypyridine analogue (18) which demonstrated equal potency compared with the natural product (2), albeit with a significant reduction in hemolytic activity (<1% vs. 80% at 100 mu M).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available