4.7 Article

Microstructure control and thermoelectric figure of merit of Bi2O3-added WO3 ceramics

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 47, Issue 22, Pages 32111-32117

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.08.101

Keywords

Electrical conductivity; Thermal conductivity; Thermoelectric properties; WO3

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microstructure of Bi2O3-added WO3 ceramics was controlled by adjusting Bi/W atomic ratio and firing temperature. Higher power factors were observed in ceramics with larger WO3 grains due to higher electron carrier concentrations, resulting in higher figure of merit ZT values. The highest ZT value of 2.4 x 10-3 at 873 K was achieved for ceramics fired at 1223 K.
Microstructure control for Bi2O3-added WO3 ceramics is explored by changing the atomic ratio of Bi/W and the firing temperature. Densified WO3 ceramics with two distinct microstructures are obtained for Bi/W = 0.005; the ceramic fired at 1123 K consists of WO3 fine grains measuring several micrometers in size, whereas those fired at 1173 K and 1223 K consist of large WO3 grains measuring several 10 mu m in size. The grain growth is enhanced by a Bi2W2O9 liquid phase formed among the WO3 particles during the firing. Seebeck coefficient S, electrical conductivity sigma, and thermal conductivity kappa are measured at high temperatures for the three ceramics to elucidate the dimensionless figure of merit ZT, where Z is defined as S2 sigma kappa- 1 and T is the absolute temperature. The ceramics consisting of larger WO3 grains display higher power factors S2 sigma due to the higher electron carrier concentrations. The ZT values are consequently higher for these ceramics because the kappa values are lower, due most likely to the larger phonon scattering by the grain boundaries developed among the larger WO3 grains. The highest ZT is 2.4 x 10-3 at 873 K for the ceramic fired at 1223 K.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available