4.7 Article

High dielectric constant of NiFe2O4-LaFeO3 nanocomposite: Interfacial conduction and dielectric loss

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 47, Issue 24, Pages 34278-34288

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.08.338

Keywords

A; sol-gel processes; B; Composites; B; Grain boundaries; C; Dielectric properties

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, India [DST/TMD/MES/2k18/82, GAP-30/19]
  2. Indian Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a nanocomposite of NiFe2O4 and LaFeO3 was synthesized via a sol-gel method, with the ratio of 1:2 of NiFe2O4-LaFeO3 exhibiting a high dielectric constant of 10390 at 1 kHz. The high dielectric constant and loss were attributed to the Maxwell-Wagner type space charge polarization arising from the microstructure that consists of large and continuous grain boundaries, and the conducting phase at the interface, respectively.
Materials exhibiting colossal dielectric constant are the most sought-after materials due to their variety of applications in various electronics industries. NiFe2O4 and LaFeO3 belonging to the spinel and perovskite structures, respectively, were coupled into a nanocomposite by adapting a one-pot sol-gel synthesis. The ratio of NiFe2O4:LaFeO3 was varied and the synthesized materials were studied for their dielectric behaviors. Interestingly, among the samples studied, the nanocomposite with the ratio of 1:2 of NiFe2O4-LaFeO3 exhibited a high dielectric constant value of 10390 at a frequency of 1 kHz with a several-fold increase in conductivity. The high conductivity resulted in a high dielectric loss. The origin of such a high dielectric constant and loss have been attributed to the Maxwell-Wagner type space charge polarization arising from the microstructure that consists of large and continuous grain boundaries, and the conducting phase at the interface, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available