4.4 Article

BoNT-A efficacy in high frequency migraine: an open label, single arm, exploratory study applying the PREEMPT paradigm

Journal

CEPHALALGIA
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 170-175

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/03331024211034508

Keywords

Migraine; BoNT-A; high frequency episodic migraine

Funding

  1. Allergan - AbbVie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Onabotulinum toxin-A showed significant efficacy in preventing high-frequency episodic migraine, reducing monthly migraine days, headache days, and intake of acute medications, as well as improving disability and quality of life for patients.
Introduction In this open label, single-arm trial we evaluated the efficacy of onabotulinum toxin-A in the prevention of high-frequency episodic migraine (8-14 migraine days/month). Methods We enrolled 32 high-frequency episodic migraine subjects (age 44.8 +/- 11.9 years, 11.0 +/- 2.2 migraine days, 11.5 +/- 2.1 headache days, 7 females). After a 28-day baseline period, subjects underwent 4 subsequent onabotulinum toxin-A treatments according to the phase III research evaluating migraine prophylaxis therapy (PREEMPT) paradigm, 12-weeks apart. The primary outcome was the reduction of monthly migraine days from baseline in the 12-week period following the last onabotulinum toxin-A treatment Results Onabotulinum toxin-A reduced monthly migraine days by 3.68 days (-33.1%, p < 0.01). Thirty-nine percent of the patients experienced a >= 50% reduction in monthly migraine days. Onabotulinum toxin-A also reduced the number of headache days (-33.9%, p < 0.01) and the intake of acute medications (-22.9%, p = 0.03). Disability and quality of life (QoL) scores improved markedly (migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) -41.7%; migraine specific questionnaire (MSQ) -31.7%, p < 0.01). Conclusions The findings suggest that, when administered according to the PREEMPT paradigm, onabotulinum toxin-A is effective in the prevention of high-frequency episodic migraine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available