4.7 Article

Use of kaolinite clays in development of a low carbon MgO-clay binder system

Journal

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106422

Keywords

MgO; Kaolin clay; X-ray diffraction; Porosity; Hydrotalcite

Funding

  1. Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, New Zealand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that magnesium oxide based cements can serve as a promising alternative to Portland cement, and can be produced using calcined kaolinitic clay. The MgO binder shows comparable or better compressive strength and significantly lower porosity compared to systems containing silica fume. The presence of magnesium carbonate further enhances the physical properties of the clay mixes.
Magnesium oxide based cements may provide a promising alternative to the conventional Portland cement in many applications. This study investigates the feasibility of using calcined kaolinitic clay to produce an MgO binder. The MgO-based binder were prepared using a low kaolinite content clay and metakaolin and were compared with a silica fume system. Implications of the addition of magnesium carbonate in the binder were also investigated. Isothermal calorimetry, X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were used to study the hydration characteristics of the binder system whereas compressive strength and porosity were measured to determine mechanical and durability attributes. The economic and environmental aspects of the binder system is also discussed. Hydrotalcite like phases were clearly produced on hydration in the clay mixes containing carbonate additions. The compressive strength of clay mixes was at par or better compared to systems containing silica fume, and the clay systems had significantly lower porosity levels. The presence of magnesium carbonate further enhanced the physical properties of the clay mixes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available