4.7 Article

The role of fiber-matrix compatibility in vacuum processed natural fiber/epoxy biocomposites

Journal

CELLULOSE
Volume 28, Issue 12, Pages 7845-7857

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-021-04055-7

Keywords

Natural fibers; Biocomposites; Composite processing; Mechanical properties; Compatibility

Funding

  1. Colombia Scientific Program [FP44842- 218-2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research aimed to produce epoxy resin biocomposites using natural fibers as reinforcement. The study found that vacuum level and fiber-matrix compatibility play important roles in determining the mechanical properties of the materials. High vacuum pressure does not necessarily lead to better performance in biocomposites, in contrast to composites made with synthetic fibers.
Utilization of raw natural fibers is a research topic of interest for achieving low-cost and ecofriendly composite materials with properties including low density and high specific strength. In order to obtain materials with these properties, matrix-reinforcement characteristics should be taken into account, as well as the processing method. Therefore, the aim of this research is the production of epoxy resin biocomposites by using three natural fibers as reinforcement, which helped to stablish the role of compatibility and vacuum level in the material's mechanical properties. Fique, Fique-cotton and Moriche fibers were molded with epoxy resin at different vacuum pressures, resulting in materials with tensile strengths of 50.7 +/- 1.3 MPa and 31.5 +/- 0.5 MPa for Epoxy/Fique and Epoxy/Fique-Cotton biocomposites processed under a vacuum pressure of 0.4 bar, respectively. The best result for epoxy/moriche biocomposites was 31.5 +/- 0.5 MPa at 0 bar. This demonstrated the differences in fiber-matrix compatibility and that applying high vacuum is not necessarily beneficial for achieving high performance biocomposites, as it is commonly the case for composites manufactured with synthetic fibers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available