4.4 Article

A Two-Step Bioreactor for Decellularized Lung Epithelialization

Journal

CELLS TISSUES ORGANS
Volume 210, Issue 4, Pages 276-284

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000517622

Keywords

Bioreactor; Rotation seeding; Lung tissue engineering; Decellularized scaffold

Funding

  1. NSF [CMMI-135162]
  2. NIH-NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA016059]
  3. NIH [R21HL146250]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The advancement of bioreactors for reseeding decellularized lung scaffolds has led to improved cell seeding, culture, and growth, offering a new approach for recellularizing lungs and other geometrically complex organs in tissue engineering.
Bioreactors for the reseeding of decellularized lung scaffolds have evolved with various advancements, including biomimetic mechanical stimulation, constant nutrient flow, multi-output monitoring, and large mammal scaling. Although dynamic bioreactors are not new to the field of lung bioengineering, ideal conditions during cell seeding have not been extensively studied or controlled. To address the lack of cell dispersal in traditional seeding methods, we have designed a two-step bioreactor. The first step is a novel system that rotates a seeded lung every 20 min at different angles in a sequence designed to anchor 20% of cells to a particular location based on the known rate of attachment. The second step involves perfusion-ventilation culture to ensure nutrient dispersion and cellular growth. Compared to statically seeded lungs, rotationally seeded lungs had significantly increased dsDNA content and more uniform cellular distribution after perfusion and ventilation had been administered. The addition of this novel seeding system before traditional culture methods will aid in recellularizing the lung and other geometrically complex organs for tissue engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available