4.8 Article

Whole-body integration of gene expression and single-cell morphology

Journal

CELL
Volume 184, Issue 18, Pages 4819-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.07.017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EMBO LTF
  2. Horizon 2020 EvoCELL'' project [766053]
  3. Advanced grant NeuralCellTypeEvo'' of the European Commission [788921]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [788921] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Animal bodies are composed of cell types with unique gene expression programs that determine their locations, shapes, structures, and functions, assembling into specific tissues and organs. By registering an expression atlas to an electron microscopy volume, the link between cell-type-specific gene expression and morphology can be systematically explored.
Animal bodies are composed of cell types with unique expression programs that implement their distinct locations, shapes, structures, and functions. Based on these properties, cell types assemble into specific tissues and organs. To systematically explore the link between cell-type-specific gene expression and morphology, we registered an expression atlas to a whole-body electron microscopy volume of the nereid Platynereis dumerilii. Automated segmentation of cells and nuclei identifies major cell classes and establishes a link between gene activation, chromatin topography, and nuclear size. Clustering of segmented cells according to gene expression reveals spatially coherent tissues. In the brain, genetically defined groups of neurons match ganglionic nuclei with coherent projections. Besides interneurons, we uncover sensory-neurosecretory cells in the nereid mushroom bodies, which thus qualify as sensory organs. They furthermore resemble the vertebrate telencephalon by molecular anatomy. We provide an integrated browser as a Fiji plugin for remote exploration of all available multimodal datasets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available