4.8 Article

Budding epithelial morphogenesis driven by cell-matrix versus cell-cell adhesion

Journal

CELL
Volume 184, Issue 14, Pages 3702-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH Intramural Research Program (NIDCR) [ZIA DE000525]
  2. NIH Intramural Research Program (NIBIB) [ZIA EB000094]
  3. NIH Distinguished Scholars Program
  4. NIDCR K99 Pathway to Independence Award [K99 DE27982]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that in embryonic salivary glands, budding morphogenesis is driven by the expansion and folding of a specific epithelial surface cell sheet characterized by strong cell-matrix adhesions and weak cell-cell adhesions. Experimental validation showed that cell-matrix adhesion is essential for budding morphogenesis.
Many embryonic organs undergo epithelial morphogenesis to form tree-like hierarchical structures. However, it remains unclear what drives the budding and branching of stratified epithelia, such as in the embryonic salivary gland and pancreas. Here, we performed live-organ imaging of mouse embryonic salivary glands at single-cell resolution to reveal that budding morphogenesis is driven by expansion and folding of a distinct epithelial surface cell sheet characterized by strong cell-matrix adhesions and weak cell-cell adhesions. Profiling of single-cell transcriptomes of this epithelium revealed spatial patterns of transcription underlying these cell adhesion differences. We then synthetically reconstituted budding morphogenesis by experimentally suppressing E-cadherin expression and inducing basement membrane formation in 3D spheroid cultures of engineered cells, which required beta 1-integrin-mediated cell-matrix adhesion for successful budding. Thus, stratified epithelial budding, the key first step of branching morphogenesis, is driven by an overall combination of strong cell-matrix adhesion and weak cell-cell adhesion by peripheral epithelial cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available