4.7 Article

Soil fertility quality assessment based on geographically weighted principal component analysis (GWPCA) in large-scale areas

Journal

CATENA
Volume 201, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105197

Keywords

Soil fertility quality assessment; Spatially varying relationships; Spatially varying weights; Geographically weighted principal component analysis; Sequential Gaussian simulation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41771249]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1800104]
  3. Knowledge Innovation Program of Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences [ISSASIP1623]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS [2018348]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a novel method for assessing soil fertility quality index based on geographically weighted principal component analysis (GWPCA), showing that GWPCA is more effective in considering spatially varying relationships among soil indicators than traditional PCA.
Principal component analysis (PCA) has been widely used in the integrated soil fertility quality index (SFQI) (SFQI(PCA)) assessment. However, the traditional PCA, only established in variable space, does not consider the spatially varying relationships among soil fertility indicators in large-scale areas, and thus cannot appropriately determine the spatially varying relative importance (i.e., weight calculated based on communality) of soil indicators in the SFQI assessment. Moreover, uncertainty inevitably exists in the spatial distribution pattern of SFQI due to the limited sample points, which is critical to the precision management of soil fertility. To address these limitations, this study first proposed a novel assessment method for SFQI based on geographically weighted principal component analysis (GWPCA) (SFQI(GWPCA)). Secondly, SFQI(GWPCA) was assessed in Shayang County, China, and then compared with the traditional SFQI(PCA). Finally, the spatial uncertainty of SFQI(GWPCA) was assessed based on the 1000 realizations generated by sequential Gaussian simulation (SGS). Results showed that (i) spatially varying relationships among soil indicators were revealed by Monte Carlo test and GWPCA outputs (i.e., the winning variable and the local percentage of total variation), while traditionally-used PCA was conducted in the assumption of spatially stationary relationships among soil indicators; (ii) in SFQI assessment, the spatially varying indicator weights were determined by GWPCA, but could not be determined by PCA; (iii) the areas with higher threshold-exceeding probability (>= 0.95) mainly located in the northwest of this county, and the areas with lower threshold-exceeding probability (<= 0.05) mainly located in the east of this county. It is concluded that GWPCA adequately considers the spatially varying relationships among soil indicators, and SFQI(GWPCA) is an effective tool in the SFQI assessment in large-scale areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available