4.6 Article

Densification of frost on hydrophilic and hydrophobic substrates - Examining the effect of surface wettability

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE
Volume 75, Issue -, Pages 25-34

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.01.008

Keywords

Frost growth; Aluminum; Contact angle; Surface wettability; Density; Frost thickness; Hydrophilic; Hydrophobic

Funding

  1. Miami University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The properties of a growing frost layer were analyzed and compared for surfaces of different wettability to determine the effect that the surface energy has on the frost mass, thickness, and density. Three surfaces were tested - an uncoated, untreated aluminum plate (Surface 1), an identical plate coated with a hydrophobic coating (Surface 2), and a plate containing a hydrophilic coating (Surface 3). For these experiments, the frost layer was grown for a three-hour period inside a Plexiglas environmental test chamber where the relative humidity was held constant (i.e. 60%, 80%) using an ultrasonic humidifier. The surface temperature of the plate was fixed using a thermoelectric cooler (TEC) and monitored by four thermocouples affixed to the surface and stage. Frost thickness was determined from images of the frost layer taken using a CCD camera mounted directly overhead. A reduction in frost density of 37-41% was observed on the hydrophobic surface (Surface 2), whereas an increase of 20-26% was consistently observed on the hydrophilic surface (Surface 3) as compared to the baseline surface. Frost layer property data were also compared against models found in the literature. Reasonably good agreement was observed when comparing against data from the baseline surface; however, the agreement was not generally as good when compared against the hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces suggesting the need for surface wettability to be included as a parameter in future frost densification models. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available