4.6 Article

Heat transfer performance of closed loop pulsating heat pipes with methanol-based binary mixtures

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages 253-263

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.04.005

Keywords

Methanol; Mixture working fluids; Closed loop pulsating heat pipe; Heat transfer; Vapor-liquid phase transition

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51076104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, an experimental study is presented on the thermal resistance characteristics of closed loop pulsating heat pipes (CLPHPs) with methanol-based binary mixtures. The working fluids were methanol mixed with deionized water, acetone and ethanol. The volume mixing ratios used were 2:1, 4:1 and 7:1, and the heating power ranged from 10 W to 100 W with filling ratios of 45%, 62%, 70% and 90%. The results showed that adding other working fluids to methanol could change the thermal resistance characteristics of a PHP. At a low filling ratio (45%), adding water to methanol could prevent dry-out at a high heating power; when ethanol was added to methanol, the thermal resistance of the CLPHP was between that with pure methanol and ethanol; when acetone was added, the thermal resistance of the CLPHP was slightly lower than that with pure methanol and acetone. At a high filling ratio (62%, 70%, 90%), the thermal resistance characteristics of CLPHPs with methanol based mixtures were not much different from those with pure fluids except for methanol-water mixture where the thermal resistance was greater than that with pure methanol and pure water. It can be inferred that the heat transfer performances of CLPHPs with methanol-based binary mixtures are related to the thermal-physical properties of the working fluids, vapor-liquid phase transition properties, molecular interactions and the additional resistance to mass transfer. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available