4.8 Article

Nanostructure quantification of turbostratic carbon by HRTEM image analysis: State of the art, biases, sensitivity and best practices

Journal

CARBON
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages 688-707

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.03.043

Keywords

High resolution transmission electron microscopy; Turbostratic carbon; Combustion-generated carbon; Soot; Image analysis

Funding

  1. European Union through the Institutional Excellence program of the Hungarian Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HRTEM is widely used for nanostructure analysis of turbostratic carbon. With digital imaging and image analysis, quantification and derivation of structural properties from HRTEM images are possible. Best practices for image acquisition and analysis are provided based on sensitivity analysis of a large dataset of micrographs.
High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM) has been a widely used technique for the analysis of nanostructure of turbostratic carbon. Since the late nineties, digital imaging and image analysis has made it possible to quantify and derive structural properties from HRTEM images. A number of image analysis methodologies have been proposed, based on which numerous studies drew their conclusions about a variety of materials including soot, carbon black, char, black carbon, carbon nano-onions, fullerenes, pyrocarbon, hard carbon, etc. Recognizing the need for standardization in order to make measurements comparable, repeatable and reproducible, this study is a review of published techniques and a critical analysis of a representative set of them. Based on sensitivity analysis using an extensive dataset of micrographs, best practices for image acquisition and image analysis are provided. Measurement uncertainties and sensitivities to image analysis parameters are estimated. A set of improvements to the state-of-the-art is proposed. Computer code for the presented methods is made available. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available