4.7 Review

Cellulose nanocrystals suspensions: Liquid crystal anisotropy, rheology and films iridescence

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 261, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117848

Keywords

Nanocellulose; Cellulose nanocrystals; Liquid crystals; Rheology; Iridescent films

Funding

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promoci 'on Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT) [PICT-2017-1318]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas(CONICET) [PIP 2017 0100677]
  3. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (UNMdP) [15/G557, ING561/19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the properties of aqueous suspensions of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) and their casted films, discussing the effects of various variables on their rheological behavior and optical properties, emphasizing the need for control over these parameters.
The properties of aqueous suspensions of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) and their casted films are revised. The bionanoparticles are briefly introduced, including modifications of the crystals and the suspending media. The formation of CNC-derived liquid crystals (LC) and their resulting rheological behavior are presented. The effects of different variables are addressed: CNC aspect ratio, surface chemistry, concentration, time required for the appearance of an anisotropic phase and addition of other components to the suspension media. The changes on the structure induced by alignment, and by conditions of the drying process are also reported. The optical properties of the films are considered, and the effect of the above variables on the final transparency, iridescence and overall optical response of these bio-inspired photonic materials. Control of the reviewed variables is needed to achieve reliable materials in applications such as sensors, smart inks and papers, transparent flexible supports for electronics, decorative coatings and films.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available