4.7 Article

Fabrication and characterization of Rhizochitosan and its incorporation with platelet concentrates to promote wound healing

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 268, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118239

Keywords

Rhizopus stolonifer; Chitosan; Hydrogel; Wound healing

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China [MOST 1092221E038001MY3, MOST 1092314B264001, MOST 109-2320-B-037-018]
  2. Jinlungyuan Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A composite dressing composed of Rhizochitosan and RegenplexTM was evaluated for promoting wound healing. The composite dressing showed better healing effects than individual components and control group, with possible mechanisms involving modulation of MMP-9 and MMP-2 expression levels to facilitate wound remodeling.
Composite dressing composed of Rhizochitosan and RegenplexTM to promote wound healing were assessed. Rhizochitosan was fabricated by deacetylation of Rhizochitin, which obtained by simply depigmenting sporangium-free mycelial mattress produced from Rhizopus stolonifer F6. Physicochemical characterizations of Rhizochitosan demonstrated that it contained 13.5% chitosan with a water-absorption ability of 35-fold dry weight and exhibiting hydrogel nature after hydration. In a wound-healing study on SD rats with full-thickness injury, the composite dressing had a better healing effect than those for each individual components and control group and wound even healed as functional tissue instead of scar tissue. The underlying mechanism of the composite beneficial to wound remodeling is likely attributable to a more reduction level of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 expression in early stage and a higher MMP-2 expression level in a later stage of healing process. Conclusively, the composite dressing demonstrated to be highly beneficial to the healing of fullthickness injury wound.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available