4.6 Review

Adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma: Current knowledges and future perspectives

Journal

CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS
Volume 97, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102207

Keywords

Renal cell carcinoma; Adjuvant therapy; Targeted therapy; Tyrosine kinase inhibitor; Immunotherapy; Immune checkpoint inhibitor

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adjuvant systemic therapies for non-metastatic RCC have shown limited effectiveness, leading researchers to explore immune therapy and other alternative strategies to improve patient outcomes and increase cure rates.
While many patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can be cured with surgery alone, upward of 40% of patients recur in a short delay, raising the question of additional perioperative treatments. To address this clinical need, multiple trials have investigated the addition of systemic therapy after surgery in localized or locally advanced RCC. However, adjuvant systemic therapies in the past decades have provided disappointing results with only one positive study of antiangiogenic treatments. Debatable clinical benefit of adjuvant antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy at cost of high adverse event profiles have paved the way for development of alternative perioperative strategies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Further investigation into combination therapies with immunotherapy, neoadjuvant approaches and patient selection will be key to determining optimal adjuvant therapy regimens to improve outcomes and increase cure rates for patients with non-metastatic RCC. In this review, we extensively present the strong and weakness of the five adjuvant antiangiogenic TKI trials, highlight the main differences and discuss about the reasons of failure. We also expose the current ongoing clinical trials in the perioperative setting and provide new insights concerning the evolving landscape of the management of non-metastatic RCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available