4.5 Article

Pilot Testing of a Nurse-Led Basic Symptom Self-management Support for Patients Receiving First-Line Systemic Outpatient Anticancer Treatment A Cluster-Randomized Study (Symptom Navi Pilot Study)

Journal

CANCER NURSING
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages E687-E702

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000995

Keywords

Behavior change; Implementation research; Nurse-led interventions; Self-efficacy; Self-management support; Symptom management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the Symptom Navi Program (SNP) on cancer patients' symptom management. The results did not show a significant impact of SNP on patient-reported symptom outcomes, self-efficacy, or symptom management support, suggesting the need for reconsideration of training content and intervention procedures.
Background The Symptom Navi Program (SNP) is a nurse-led intervention supporting basic symptom self-management for patients with any cancer diagnosis. The SNP has been accepted by patients and healthcare professionals alike. Objective The aims of this study were to pilot the SNP and evaluate patient-reported symptom outcomes, nursing support for symptom management, and patient safety. Methods Using a cluster-randomized design, we randomized centers to the intervention (SNP) or control group (usual care). Adult patients starting first-line systemic cancer treatment were included. The primary outcome was the change in symptom interference with daily functions from treatment onset to 16 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in symptom severity, symptom burden, self-efficacy, and perceived symptom management support and patient safety. We used linear and logistic mixed-effects models to pilot-test differences in mean changes between groups. The trial was registered with (NCT03649984). Results Changes in symptom interference with daily functions did not differ (mean difference at 16 weeks: -0.50; 95% confidence interval, -1.38 to 0.38; P = 0.25) between SNP (3 centers, 49 patients) and control (5 centers, 85 patients) as for all other outcomes. No adverse events were reported. Conclusions Our preliminary findings did not indicate an effect of the SNP on patient-reported symptom outcomes, self-efficacy, or symptom management support. Inadequate power and SNP components (eg, insufficient training, low number of follow-up consultations) may be attributed to the lack of an observed effect. Implications for Practice The SNP training content and intervention procedures merit reconsideration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available