4.7 Review

Therapeutic potentials of resveratrol in combination with radiotherapy and chemotherapy during glioblastoma treatment: a mechanistic review

Journal

CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12935-021-02099-0

Keywords

Resveratrol; Glioblastoma; Radiation therapy; Chemotherapy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glioblastoma is an aggressive type of brain tumor with resistance to conventional therapies. Resveratrol, a natural polyphenolic compound, has shown to have anti-tumoral effects by regulating various cellular pathways such as cell cycle progression, autophagy, and apoptosis. Studies have also explored the potential of using resveratrol in combination with radiation therapy and chemotherapy for glioblastoma treatment.
Glioblastoma, WHO grade IV astrocytoma, is the most aggressive type of brain tumors. These cancerous cells have a rapid growth rate, tendency to penetrate vital brain structures, molecular heterogeneity, etc. and this cancer is associated with a poor prognosis and low survival rate. Due to the resistance of glioblastoma cells to conventional therapeutic modalities (such as radiation therapy and chemotherapy) as well as the adverse effects of these modalities, the researchers have attempted to discover an appropriate alternative or adjuvant treatment for glioblastoma. Resveratrol, as an herbal and natural polyphenolic compound, has anti-tumoral property and has shown to be effective in GBM treatment. Resveratrol exerts its anti-tumoral effect through various mechanisms such as regulation of cell cycle progression and cell proliferation, autophagy, oxidant system, apoptosis pathways, and so on. Resveratrol in combination with radiation therapy and chemotherapy has also been used. In the present study, we summarized the current findings on therapeutic potentials of resveratrol in glioblastoma radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available