4.8 Article

STAG2 loss rewires oncogenic and developmental programs to promote metastasis in Ewing sarcoma

Journal

CANCER CELL
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 827-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.05.007

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI [R01 CA204915, K08 CA188073]
  2. RO1 supplement [3R01 CA204915-03S1]
  3. St Jude's Collaborative Research Consortium
  4. Curing Kids Cancer
  5. St. Baldrick's Foundation
  6. Ewing Cancer Foundation of Canada
  7. C17 Childhood Cancer Canada Foundation
  8. Department of Defense PRCRP Horizon Award [CA181249]
  9. NIGMS [TC32GM007753]
  10. CDMRP [1102272, CA181249] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that mutations in STAG2 can alter chromatin architecture and transcriptional programs, leading to a more aggressive cancer phenotype.
The core cohesin subunit STAG2 is recurrently mutated in Ewing sarcoma but its biological role is less clear. Here, we demonstrate that cohesin complexes containing STAG2 occupy enhancer and polycomb repressive complex (PRC2)-marked regulatory regions. Genetic suppression of STAG2 leads to a compensatory increase in cohesin-STAG1 complexes, but not in enhancer-rich regions, and results in reprogramming of cis-chromatin interactions. Strikingly, in STAG2 knockout cells the oncogenic genetic program driven by the fusion transcription factor EWS/FLI1 was highly perturbed, in part due to altered enhancer-promoter contacts. Moreover, loss of STAG2 also disrupted PRC2-mediated regulation of gene expression. Combined, these transcriptional changes converged to modulate EWS/FLI1, migratory, and neurodevelopmental programs. Finally, consistent with clinical observations, functional studies revealed that loss of STAG2 enhances the metastatic potential of Ewing sarcoma xenografts. Our findings demonstrate that STAG2 mutations can alter chromatin architecture and transcriptional programs to promote an aggressive cancer phenotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available