4.5 Review

Checkpoint inhibitor therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Journal

CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 537-547

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10555-021-09972-4

Keywords

Triple-negative breast cancer; Metastatic; Immunotherapy; Checkpoint inhibitor; Review

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immunotherapy has become a key component in the treatment of cancer, with promising activity observed in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) through PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Accelerated approvals by the FDA for atezolizumab and pembrolizumab in 2019 and 2020, respectively, have provided hope for the treatment of PD-L1-positive TNBC.
Immunotherapy has become a mainstay of cancer treatment in many malignancies, though its application in breast cancer remains limited. Of the breast cancer subtypes, triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are characterized by immune activation and infiltration and more commonly express biomarkers associated with response to immunotherapy. Checkpoint inhibitor therapy has shown promising activity in metastatic TNBC. In 2019, the US FDA granted accelerated approval of atezolizumab, a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor, in combination with nab-paclitaxel for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic PD-L1-positive TNBC, based on the results of the phase III IMpassion130 trial. In 2020, the FDA also granted accelerated approval of pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, in combination with chemotherapy for locally recurrent unresectable and metastatic PD-L1-positive TNBC, based on results of the phase III KEYNOTE-355 trial. Additional combination strategies are being explored in the treatment of metastatic TNBC, with the goal of augmenting antitumor activity. In this review, the clinical development of checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic TNBC will be discussed, including clinical outcomes with monotherapy and combination therapy regimens, biomarkers that may predict for benefit, and future directions in the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available