4.7 Article

Intensity of end-of-life care for dual-eligible beneficiaries with cancer and the impact of delivery system affiliation

Journal

CANCER
Volume 127, Issue 24, Pages 4628-4635

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33874

Keywords

cancer; dual-eligible; end of life; quality

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [1--R01--CA--174768--01--A1, K08CA237638, P30CA046592]
  2. California Department of Public Health [103885]
  3. National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program [HHSN261201000140C, HHSN261201000035C, HHSN261201000034C]
  4. National Program of Cancer Registries of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [U58DP003862--01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dual-eligible beneficiaries, who qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid, are a vulnerable population that may benefit greatly from efforts to improve quality of care. Affiliation with an integrated delivery network or cancer center may have a modest impact on end-of-life care quality for these patients, suggesting targeted efforts may be needed to optimize care for this group.
Background Dual-eligible beneficiaries, who qualify for Medicare and Medicaid, are a vulnerable population with much to gain from efforts to improve quality. Integrated delivery networks and cancer centers, with their emphasis on care coordination and communication, may improve quality of care for dual-eligible patients with cancer at the end of life. Methods This study used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data linked with Medicare claims to evaluate quality for beneficiaries who died of cancer and were diagnosed from 2009 to 2014. High-intensity care was evaluated with 7 end-of-life quality measures according to dual-eligible status with multivariable logistic regression models. Regression-based techniques were used to assess the effect of delivery system affiliation (ie, cancer center or integrated delivery network vs no affiliation). Results Among 100,549 beneficiaries who died during the study interval, 22% were dually eligible. Inferior outcomes were identified for dual-eligible beneficiaries in comparison with nondual beneficiaries across nearly every quality measure assessed, including >1 hospitalization in the last 30 days (12.6% vs 11.3%; P < .001) and a greater proportion of deaths occurring in a hospital setting (30.2% vs 26.2%; P < .001). Receipt of care in an affiliated delivery system was associated with reduced deaths in a hospital setting and increased hospice utilization for dual-eligible beneficiaries. Conclusions Dual-eligible status is associated with higher intensity care at the end of life. Delivery system affiliation has a modest impact on quality at the end of life, and this suggests that targeted efforts may be needed to optimize quality for this group of vulnerable patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available