4.7 Article

Weight loss does not decrease risk of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema

Journal

CANCER
Volume 127, Issue 21, Pages 3939-3945

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33819

Keywords

breast cancer; breast cancer-related lymphedema; lymphedema; weight change

Categories

Funding

  1. Harvard Catalyst-The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health) [UL 1TR002541]
  2. Harvard University
  3. Adele McKinnon Research Fund for Breast Cancer--Related Lymphedema
  4. Heinz Family Foundation
  5. Olayan-Xefos Family Fund for Breast Cancer Research
  6. National Cancer Institute [R01CA139118, P50CA08393]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine the relationship between postoperative weight change and breast cancer-related lymphedema. The findings suggest that weight loss alone may not decrease the risk of developing BCRL.
BACKGROUND The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between postoperative weight change and breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). METHODS In this cohort study, 1161 women underwent unilateral breast surgery for breast cancer from 2005 to 2020 and were prospectively screened for BCRL. Arm volume measurements were obtained via an optoelectronic perometer preoperatively, postoperatively, and in the follow-up setting every 6 to 12 months. Mean follow-up from preoperative baseline was 49.1 months. The main outcome was BCRL, defined as a relative volume change of the ipsilateral arm of >= 10% at least 3 months after surgery. RESULTS A total of 92 patients (7.9%) developed BCRL. Net weight loss versus net weight gain from baseline to last follow-up was not protective against developing BCRL (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-2.13; P = .152). CONCLUSIONS Although weight loss may be recommended as part of an individualized lifestyle management program for overall health, weight loss alone may not decrease the risk of developing BCRL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available